Monday, April 11, 2011
May the Seventh be with YOU!
Wednesday, April 6, 2011
The Hopeful Delusion
It is common to draw a distinction between "ordinary" love and "true love." The bond of true love is usually expected to be eternal; some even insist that it transcends physical death, which is a dubious conclusion to reach given the information we have (or do not have) about what happens to us when and after we die. Platonic love is less often described as permanent. We have all outgrown friends, and it is usually at least an uncomfortable experience. But romantic love can fail for all the same reasons that platonic love does. There is no reason to assume that any particular feeling of love is truer than any other or that love of any certain intensity should remain miraculously unchanged until your dying day. We should view all of our feelings, no matter how fleeting or powerful, through the lens of logic. Referring to any type of love as true seems to cast other love-like feelings - such as infatuation - as inferior and unworthy of much time under scrutiny, when it is very often these preliminary feelings that can lead to the feeling that many call "true love" in the first place. All feelings are true, even if they are disproportionate to their causes.
Love changes because people change. Our feelings do not exist extrinsic from our minds. As we live and associate with each other, we discover nuances of personality that we may dislike. Our interests evolve, and most peoples' paths will eventually diverge, no matter how close they are from the outset. The friends you had when you were 6 years old and had a whole world to explore and a self to find within it are probably entirely different people now with interests beyond climbing trees and rambling through wooded areas with sticks for swords. The imaginary foes of your youth are all defeated; they have been replaced with real foes, and your interests have likely shifted monumentally, leaving you virtually, if not entirely, incompatible with your comrades of old. We are like ice cubes dumped from an ice cube tray: two may start out in the same shape, but they will probably melt in completely different ways. This is why distance so often kills friendships - separated geographically, you are exposed to different influences and are more likely to develop incompatible interests. Romantic love works in the same way. People change. They grow. Even the truest of love, whatever that means, can dwindle with age. Love takes time, and this is why we cannot love instantly. But, with time, love changes, and this is why it is unrealistic to assume that we might love eternally.
Much emphasis is placed on falling in love and getting married. Romantic love is seen as a goal for which anything might be sacrificed, and those without it are often depicted as less fortunate than those who manage to find it. A lack of proper understanding about feelings of romantic attachment will lead almost certainly to sorrow, no matter what it may be popular to say about the power of love. My wife and I have been together for 11 years, and we've been married for 3. I can say that love and marriage can be wonderful and sublimely rewarding, but approaching any kind of relationship with your head in the clouds and unrealistic expectations of mystical eternity will lead to spectacular failure virtually without variation. Wait until you have done most of your growing to get married. Make decisions based on reason, and do not bet everything until you really understand the odds. Magical thinking in general is detrimental to any society's maturity; if we cannot break the bonds of wishful thinking, we shall be doomed to lunge forever at the shadow of perfection and to fall again and again into sadness and failure that are only made more terrible by our hopeful delusion.
Sunday, April 3, 2011
Hop: the Movie NoBunny Should Miss.
----------
Sent from the Verizon network using Mobile Email
Tuesday, March 29, 2011
Max Headroom
----------
Sent from the Verizon network using Mobile Email
Back in the Saddle.
So tomorrow I will post about the TWO Ghostbusters I got in the mail from Mattel and also will write about INFESTATION. :)
----------
Sent from the Verizon network using Mobile Email
Monday, March 28, 2011
The Man Behind the Curtain
The debate began innocently enough, though I admit it was meddling in the affairs of others that got me involved. In the comments section of a YouTube video of a talk involving atheist authors Sam Harris and Christopher Hitchens, OneApostate was arguing that Harris cannot be a Jew because he is an atheist. He was arguing with someone else, but I felt the need to offer that Sam Harris was raised in a secular Jewish household and self-identifies as Jewish. He replied with the opinion that there are no such things as secular Jews, and the argument snowballed until we were exchanging personal messages. I offered him proof in the form of links to articles about Jewish ethnicity published by the New York Times and the National Academy of the Sciences, articles about genetic diseases that disproportionately affect those with Jewish ancestry published on Jewish websites and on WebMD, and a link to an article by Hitchens on SamHarris.org in which Hitchens describes Sam Harris as Jewish. At this point, I didn't hold out much hope that he would read any of this, but I hoped he would at least pay attention to such article titles as NAS's "Jewish and Middle Eastern non-Jewish populations share a common pool of Y-chromosome biallelic haplotypes" and the NY Times's "Studies Show Jews' Genetic Similarity," but I was bitterly disappointed when he wrote back immediately to state, "There is no such thing as Jewish DNA period."
He had not read my message. He hadn't even glanced at it. That was how it seemed. How can one look at the web address "jewishgeneticscenter.org" and then say that there is no such thing as Jewish genetics? Things went downhill from there. He offered strawman arguments and challenged me to produce evidence for absurd claims. He constantly asked if I considered myself Jewish, hinting at a hypersensitivity to anti-Semitic prejudice. OneApostate was clearly trying to turn what he interpreted as an anti-Semitic claim back on me when he said, "Since you are related to every Jew on the planet [through Evolution], and you believe in Jewish DNA, I'm going to call you Jewish."
Eventually, I withdrew myself from the debate, telling him that I had a more educational discussion with a brick to participate in, but the argument still disturbs me. I have met people who denied mountains of incontrovertible proof and who clung to absurd beliefs before, but OneApostate's assertion was so utterly ridiculous and his rejection of the clear truth was so complete that I found myself fascinated. I knew that I couldn't get through to him, but I kept on trying. I kept presenting evidence even though he would just circle back to his initial assertion whenever I presented evidence he could not refute. I know he saw me as an anti-Semite, but I have suspicions that he sees just about everyone that way. He is likely someone who has been on the receiving end of anti-Semitic abuse - he actually claims to have been on his channel - and refused to engage with me rationally because he heard my claims as an indictment of Jewish people. But why engage me at all if he thought I was just a bigot? Why did I bother continuing the discussion with him?
I am left with naught but questions. This isn't a private belief of his; this is a personal crusade, and OneApostate probably surrounds himself with people who think just like he does. These delusional people are amassing somewhere, spreading their insipid lies even in the face of irrefutable proof of their insanity. When they are shouting from street corners or raging on the internet, we encourage one another to ignore them. What do we do when they are patrolling our cities in police cruisers, when they are drafting legislation as politicians, or when they are voting for Presidential candidates? When do we decide that rage-blind, anti-social head cases are not only obnoxious but dangerous, and how do we act when we do?
Sunday, March 27, 2011
Agent 47 Returning In 2011
A new image has been showing up around the internet, after members of a hitman blog emailed a company responsible for an ad in the sundance film festival catalog. The picture in the catalog showed a doughnut box branded hitman with a barcode ending it 47. They were emailed back a new pic of a table with a pair of black gloves, what appears to be a script, and another barcode with the ending of 47. Apparantly, the random numbers in the barcode point to E3.
See for yourself-
http://i52.tinypic.com/3590enm.jpg
Then, this image was uncovered by another group.
Which just about guarantees a new hitman game in the works.
Saturday, March 26, 2011
Superhero Movies, and Can Captain America Doom the Avengers Movie?
I'm referring to Captain America. As leader of the avengers, his movie should honestly be the one watched closely. I feel if this movie is a bomb, it could mess up things for The Avengers. If it isn't done right, it isn't going to seem like it is going to work right in 2012. However, recent trailers don't seem to be so bad, and the Thor movie is looking better too. I didn't care for the pictures that were coming out that showed a sci-fi looking Asgard.
Tuesday, March 22, 2011
A Man of Value
Pontificating on failure has led to some interesting insights. Chiefly, I wonder where it is that we get the idea that we must leave something indelible when we die. There is pressure to make something of yourself, to contribute to posterity in a lasting way, but where does this pressure come from? How many people do you honestly know personally who have built enduring legacies? The truth is that most of us leave little behind when we shuffle loose from the mortal coil than grief and funeral expenses. This sounds bad, I know. It sounds like oblivion. Y0u live, you die, you do some stuff in between that most people won't even remember. It may sound like I'm trying to rationalize giving up or to make excuses for why I've failed at being any kind of artist, but if you look at the number of people who have left the world a better place in comparison to the number of people who have lived and died and been utterly forgotten, I think you'll see that there really is a lesson to be learned here.
Be what you are, do the right thing, and don't worry about leaving an impression when you die. No matter how much renown you achieve posthumously, you'll never get to enjoy it. Be good to yourself and try to make a positive impact on the people you love while you're around to reap the rewards - lasting relationships and peace of mind. To quote Albert Einstein: "Try not to become a man of success but rather to become a man of value."
Friday, March 18, 2011
Blogged Down?
Your friend.
Wednesday, March 16, 2011
Jobbing Out to UFC
Within the industry, I would be referred to as a "smart mark." This basically means that I know the whole thing is a work, but it also means that I know a lot about the industry. I know about booking matches, and I know about high spots, and I read a lot about the part of the business that is not kayfabe. It's really a fascinating world filled with jock/geek hybrids and dominated by many egos that rate very high on the Sheen Megalomania Scale. Wrestling draws oddballs unlike any you will see anywhere else, and that is part of what I love about it. Could you imagine Randy Savage as a museum curator? James "The Ultimate Warrior" Hedwig has gone on to be a motivational speaker. This is mind-boggling. He also legally changed his name to Warrior; this name appears on official documents, and even his children are surnamed Warrior. The world needs pro-wrestling if only so that these singularly bizarre humans have a place to take out their weird hypermasculine/homoerotic aggression.
But there is another outlet. I have recently started watching UFC. Few are likely to describe me as a "typical male," whatever that is. Sure, part of me likes to see people getting punched in the face, but a larger part of me likes the strategic aspect of fighting - the technique. And this brings up an interesting point. Professional wrestling is worked. It isn't real. People really get hurt, but it's not a real fight going on in the ring (most of the time). Now that I've started getting into UFC, can I see why people would express disdain for pro-wrestling? Can I see how much more appealing in-ring fighting is when it's legit? Well, yes and no. UFC doesn't script outcomes. The WWE, the biggest wrestling promotion in the world for decades running, has full control over who wins a match; theoretically, they should be able to generate the kind of excitement UFC can generate on a much more consistent basis. But that hasn't been happening. Professional wrestling has become far less interesting to me than legit MMA. It's not because wrestling is fake. Wrestling and MMA are two completely different things. Wrestling has become less interesting because of egomaniacs who care more about having their private parts massaged than about generating product that can actually make money - so convinced are they that everything they produce is golden. Kayfabe is dead, but it lingers, and many people in the business book almost as if they still buy it. I'm sure that UFC is jammed full of huge egos and jacked-up manchildren, but it possesses a degree of legitimacy that the WWE cannot approach right now because, there, egos are allowed to run wild, brother. Whatcha gonna do when Vince-a-mania runs wild on you? I'm going to contribute to failing PPV buy-rates and watch UFC instead. It breaks my heart, in all honesty, to see big events like the Royal Rumble and Wrestlemania circling the drain, but it's not because wrestling looks weak in comparison to UFC. I know what wrestling can be - I lived through the Attitude Era, and I've been consistently amazed by promotions like Ring of Honor and Dragon Gate. But maybe it's time for professional wrestling in general to leave its carny mentality behind and take up its erstwhile crown. Fully functioning in a modern world and free from the tyranny of egos and backstage politics, professional wrestling can be, once again, what I say it is when I defend it from the people who tell me that it's fake: an entertaining fantasy.
Saturday, March 12, 2011
Battle: Los Angeles
We've all seen the Independence Day and other alien invasion movies so what makes this one worthwhile? It's different. No, I mean it in the good way. Everyone has seen the humans fight off aliens but with the love romance (like ID4) or the kids being involved (like in Signs) but B:LA features realistic marines with modern day technology against the whole amazing alien armada.
I just saw this movie as a date night movie and well, all I can say is that this movie is great. Go see it!
Thursday, March 10, 2011
Sony Xperia Play-Great New Gaming Technology or Another Driving Danger?
We already have people texting while driving. It seems we see it very often. Someone not watching while driving, and they are swerving between lanes. We pull up next to them at a red light. They are looking at their lap, not the road. Sometimes, shockingly, with a kid in the car. So, is serious gaming on a phone a great idea? Maybe it really isn't.
Think about it this way. If we already have people texting while driving, do you really think people won't drive while attempting to play a game on their phone? The sad truth is, thinking about it, it's very likely. Someone may favor creating their sackboy in a portable version of Little Big Planet over watching the road. These people who would come to have these phones may be a danger to themselves and others on the road.
So, what's your opinion? Is the xperia play another great piece of gaming technology or a danger to the road?
She Shook Her Peaches For Show
"reality star . ny times best selling author . business woman . boss lady"
For good measure, I suppose, she adds:
"♡Keep Talkin ;)"
The juxtaposition of this horrible train wreck of a person and the title of one of my favorite Pink Floyd songs is disturbing enough, but the fact that she lists herself as a New York Times bestselling author is, like some Lovecraftian elder god skulking through the streets of Innsmouth, enough to drive a person to madness by the sheer thought of it, and that is what this entry is about - not Twitter.
Nicole, "Snooki," Polizzi's book is a work of narrative fiction called A Shore Thing, and it was number 24 on the extended New York Times Best Seller list for January 30 of this year. It was published by Simon and Schuster, a company that has also published Ursula K. Le Guin and two-time Pulitzer Prize winner David McCullough. When interviewed by Reuters, she had this to say about her novel:
"People would rather watch TV than sit down and actually read a book, so that's why I wrote this. It's just like my show, accept you're reading it, so I'm actually bringing back reading."
Now, if Snooki reignites your interest in literature, there is a good chance that you were never that interested in it to begin with. I am writing a book. I'm pretty far into it, trying to make 2000 words a day every morning. I plot even in my sleep. I dream of my characters, my setting. It's a work of fantasy, and I have agonized over the naming conventions of my fictional race. I re-read it constantly as I go along, excising needless exposition, adding scenes that help clarify the justification for the carefully plotted action sequences, and generally criticizing myself excessively. I don't know Ms. Polizzi, and I understand how much of a snob I sound like saying this, but I cannot imagine her sitting at her computer in anguish over character development and plot arcs. I can't see her rewriting scenes to better communicate her main character's motivation. I doubt she was thinking about "bringing back reading" when she wrote such lines as:
"Yum. Johnny Hulk tasted like fresh gorilla."
Or:
"Gia danced around a little, shaking her peaches for show. She shook it hard. Too hard. In the middle of a shimmy, her stomach cramped. A fart slipped out. A loud one. And stinky."
I know there is a line between criticism and ridicule. I don't want to cross it. I don't want to sound like I'm taking pot shots at a goof-ball 20-something because I have had no amount of success whatsoever as an artist. Perhaps Polizzi wasn't trying to write The Great Gatsby. No, I think it entirely possible that she hasn't even heard of F. Scott Fitzgerald. Still, I must give her the benefit of the doubt and say that her artistic attempt is likely no less honest than mine have been. Nonetheless, pulp is pulp and crap is crap, and the fact that people have actually deliberately purchased Snooki's fictional autobiography is either an embarrassment to the august institute of literature itself or, from an optimistic standpoint, proof that I might actually have a shot at getting my silly novella published. I may, however, be forced to include descriptions on par with:
"He had an okay body. Not fat at all. And naturally toned abs. She could pour a shot of tequila down his belly and slurp it out of his navel without getting splashed in the face."
God help us all.
FWD: Digest: Special Notifications/Achievements
------Original Message------
From: Empire Avenue Accounts <accounts@empireavenue.com>
To: <scott.thomas.barnes@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Mar 10, 4:00 PM +0000
Subject: Digest: Special Notifications/Achievements
a { color:#27647b; color:#27647b; color:#27647b; text-decoration: none; }
Special Notifications!
You have been promoted to to the rank of President in the "Science Fiction" Index.
As President you report directly to the CEO and only to the CEO. Of course, in reality you are just waiting to "take down" the CEO and take over the top spot right? But still being President is no small task, you've gained more 2-Weekly earnings gains and share price rank than almost everyone but the CEO!
Do not reply to this e-mail it has been automatically generated. Manage your email settings.
Copyright (C) 2009-2011 Empire Avenue Inc. All rights reserved.
Suite 339, 14032 23rd Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta, T6R 3L6, Canada